Permanent Portfolio vs Larry Portfolio

Compare Permanent Portfolio against Larry Portfolio: passive allocation meets static portfolio design. Review CAGR, maximum drawdown, Sharpe ratio, and understand which approach fits your investment philosophy.

Performance & Risk Metrics (2016-2026)

Metric Permanent Portfolio Larry Portfolio
CAGR (10-Year Annualized Return) 6.8% 9.1%
Max Drawdown -8.2% -24.5%
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return) 0.65 0.52
Strategy Type Passive Portfolio (Strategic Buy & Hold) Passive Portfolio (Factor Tilted)
Rebalancing Frequency Annually (fixed target weights) Annually (fixed target weights)

Permanent Portfolio Philosophy

Harry Browne's Permanent Portfolio splits capital equally (25% each) among stocks, long-term government bonds, gold, and cash (T-Bills). Each asset class is designed to thrive in one of four economic states: prosperity, deflation, inflation, and recession. The quarterly rebalancing to equal weights captures mean-reversion gains across these structural allocations.

Larry Portfolio Philosophy

Larry Swedroe's factor-tilted portfolio concentrates equity exposure in small-cap value stocks globally, while holding only safe short-term bonds. This aggressive factor bet aims for the highest expected equity returns by harvesting the Size and Value premiums, while keeping bond duration short to minimize interest rate risk.

Key Differences Explained

These represent the extremes of the passive spectrum. The Permanent Portfolio is ultra-defensive (25% each in stocks, bonds, gold, cash) with only 6.8% CAGR but a mere -10.5% drawdown. The Larry Portfolio is ultra-aggressive (concentrated small-cap value + short bonds) with 9.1% CAGR but a punishing -24.5% drawdown.

  • Strategy Type: Permanent Portfolio is a passive, buy-and-hold approach. Larry Portfolio is a passive, buy-and-hold approach.
  • Return vs Risk: Permanent Portfolio delivered 6.8% CAGR with -10.5% max drawdown (Sharpe: 0.58). Larry Portfolio delivered 9.1% CAGR with -24.5% max drawdown (Sharpe: 0.52).
  • Maintenance: Permanent Portfolio needs only annual rebalancing. Larry Portfolio needs only annual rebalancing.

Side-by-Side Pros and Cons

Permanent Portfolio Strengths & Limits

  • Ultra-defensive — very low maximum drawdowns
  • Gold provides inflation hedge and crisis alpha
  • Simple to implement with only 4 ETFs
  • 25% cash drag significantly reduces long-term returns
  • Underperforms badly in strong equity bull markets
  • Long-term bonds can lose heavily in rising rate environments

Larry Portfolio Strengths & Limits

  • Highest expected returns from documented factor premiums
  • Short-term bonds eliminate interest rate risk
  • Academically grounded in Fama-French research
  • Deep drawdowns from concentrated equity factor exposure
  • Value factor can underperform growth for decades
  • Requires strong conviction to hold through long underperformance

Which Strategy is Right For You?

Choose Permanent Portfolio if: You prioritize capital preservation and can't stomach deep drawdowns. The Permanent Portfolio's structural design protects against all four economic regimes.

Choose Larry Portfolio if: You have a very long time horizon and want maximum passive returns through documented factor premiums. The Larry Portfolio's drawdowns are severe but historically temporary.

Analyze Permanent Portfolio Analyze Larry Portfolio
Share this comparison:
Twitter LinkedIn
MK
Lukso Quantitative Researcher

Lukso designs and backtests rules-based quantitative strategies. He leads research for systematic asset allocation at StrategyIndex.io.

Backtest Methodology

Backtests use historical monthly Total Return data (dividends reinvested) of proxy ETFs. We assume zero transaction slippage, target rebalancing frequency, and no leverage.

Data Sources

Historical figures sourced from Yahoo Finance API, Tiingo Cloud API, and FRED Federal Reserve Database.

Last Data Update: June 30, 2026