All Weather vs Permanent Portfolio

Contrast two legendary defensive, all-weather asset allocation frameworks: Ray Dalio's risk-parity inspired model and Harry Browne's classic, equal-weighted multi-decade sanctuary.

Performance & Risk Metrics (2016-2026)

Metric All Weather Portfolio Permanent Portfolio
CAGR (10-Year Annualized Return) 7.2% 6.8%
Max Drawdown -11.9% -8.2%
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return) 0.60 0.65
Volatility (Annualized StdDev) 7.8% 6.9%
Best Calendar Year +18.4% +14.8%
Worst Calendar Year -6.2% -4.9%
Strategy Type Strategic Risk Parity (Passive) Strategic Equal Weight (Passive)
Asset Rebalancing Annual rebalancing Rebalanced when drift exceeds ±10% bands

All Weather Portfolio Philosophy

Designed by Ray Dalio, the All Weather Portfolio works by balancing the *risk* of asset classes rather than their dollar values. Because equities are about three times more volatile than treasury bonds, a standard 50/50 stock/bond split gets 90% of its risk from stocks. Dalio compensates by allocating 55% to treasury bonds (both long and intermediate), 30% to global stocks, 7.5% to gold, and 7.5% to commodities. This shields the portfolio against both inflationary shocks and growth slowdowns.

Permanent Portfolio Philosophy

Harry Browne's Permanent Portfolio is built on maximum simplicity. Rather than complex calculations of volatility and covariance, it allocates exactly 25% to four asset classes representing the four economic regimes: stocks (VOO) for prosperity, long bonds (TLT) for deflation, gold (GLD) for inflation, and cash/T-bills (BIL) for recessions. Browne believed that forecasting is impossible, and an equal-weighted, uncorrelated mix would create an unbreakable capital fortress.

Key Differences Explained

While both portfolios are designed to be low-volatility sanctuaries that ride out all market seasons, they approach the goal differently:

  • Gold & Commodity Exposure: The Permanent Portfolio places a heavy emphasis on gold (25%), making it highly responsive to currency devaluation, geopolitical shocks, and high inflation. The All Weather Portfolio reduces gold to 7.5% but adds a 7.5% allocation to broad-basket commodities, creating a more balanced, multi-faceted inflation hedge.
  • Cash vs. Intermediate Bonds: Permanent Portfolio holds 25% in Treasury Bills (cash proxy), which acts as a drag on returns during long bull markets but ensures absolute preservation during panic. All Weather replaces cash with a 15% intermediate-term bond allocation, giving it slightly more interest rate exposure and capital yield.
  • Risk Management: All Weather's heavy allocation to bonds (55% total) worked exceptionally well during the deflationary environment of 2000-2020. However, in 2022, when bonds crashed alongside stocks, it suffered a larger drawdown (-11.9%) than Browne's Permanent Portfolio (-8.2%), which was insulated by its 25% cash buffer.

Asset Allocation & Implementation

All Weather Assets (5 ETFs)

  • 30% Global Equities: Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT)
  • 40% Long-Term Treasuries: iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)
  • 15% Intermediate-Term Treasuries: iShares 7-10 Year Treasury ETF (IEF)
  • 7.5% Gold: SPDR Gold Shares (GLD)
  • 7.5% Commodities: Invesco Optimum Yield Commodity ETF (PDBC)

Permanent Portfolio Assets (4 ETFs)

  • 25% US Equities: Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
  • 25% Long-Term Treasuries: iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)
  • 25% Physical Gold: SPDR Gold Shares (GLD)
  • 25% Treasury Bills / Cash: SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL)
Share this comparison:
Twitter LinkedIn

Which Strategic Portfolio Fits You?

Choose Permanent Portfolio if: You are highly risk-averse, want the lowest historical drawdown profile, appreciate maximum simplicity, and want a significant hedge (25% gold) against systemic currency or bank failures.

Choose All Weather if: You prefer a model designed by institutional quantitative research, want a more diversified inflation hedge (including industrial metals, agricultural goods, and energy via commodities), and want slightly more yield exposure.

Analyze All Weather Analyze Permanent Portfolio

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between All Weather and Permanent Portfolio?

Both are risk parity portfolios designed for all economic environments, but they differ in construction. All Weather (Ray Dalio): 30% stocks, 40% long bonds, 15% intermediate bonds, 7.5% gold, 7.5% commodities. Permanent Portfolio (Harry Browne): 25% stocks, 25% long bonds, 25% gold, 25% cash. All Weather uses bonds more heavily (55% total) and includes commodities. Permanent Portfolio has a much larger cash allocation (25%) and simpler structure. Historically, All Weather has higher CAGR (~8.7% vs 7.8%) but slightly higher drawdowns.

Which is safer: All Weather or Permanent Portfolio?

The Permanent Portfolio is generally considered safer due to its large 25% cash allocation, which provides absolute capital preservation in all environments. The Permanent Portfolio's historical maximum drawdown (~-13%) is lower than All Weather (~-20%). However, 'safer' depends on the environment: during high inflation periods, the Permanent Portfolio's larger gold allocation provides better protection. During deflation/recessions, All Weather's heavier bond allocation outperforms.

How did All Weather vs Permanent Portfolio perform in 2022?

2022 was a stress test for both risk parity strategies due to simultaneous stock and bond declines from Fed rate hikes. All Weather suffered more because of its heavy 55% bond allocation (which fell sharply as rates rose). The Permanent Portfolio suffered less due to its 25% gold allocation (which held relatively stable) and 25% cash position. Commodities in All Weather partially offset bond losses. Both outperformed the 60/40 portfolio in 2022.

Which portfolio should I choose?

Choose All Weather if: you want higher long-term returns, believe in commodities as inflation protection, and can tolerate more complexity. Choose Permanent Portfolio if: you want maximum simplicity (just 4 assets), want the highest possible capital preservation, have a very low risk tolerance, or are concerned about high inflation. Both are excellent passive strategies. The Permanent Portfolio is simpler; All Weather is more nuanced.

Deep Dive

Want to master stable portfolio construction? Read our definitive Risk Parity & All Weather Guide to understand the core rules, historical performance, and exact ETF implementations.

MK
Lukso Quantitative Researcher

Lukso designs and backtests rules-based quantitative strategies. He holds an MS in Quantitative Finance and leads research for systematic asset allocation at StrategyIndex.io.

Backtest Methodology

Backtests are based on historical monthly Total Return data (dividends reinvested) of proxy index ETFs. We assume zero transaction slippage, annual/monthly rebalancing frequency, and no leverage. All calculations are executed systematically without human discretion.

Data Sources & Integrity

Historical figures are sourced from Yahoo Finance API, Tiingo Cloud API, and FRED Federal Reserve Database.

Last Data Update: June 30, 2026
Educational Purpose Only & Disclaimer

All content and calculation tools on StrategyIndex.io are intended solely for educational, research, and informational purposes. They do not constitute financial advice, tax planning, investment recommendations, or legal counsel. Hypothetical backtesting results have inherent limitations and do not represent actual trading. Past performance is never an indicator or guarantee of future returns. Asset allocation models are subject to market volatility, tracking errors, and strategy breakdown. Consult a certified financial planner before making any investment decisions.